Consumer’s time may give rise indemnification



On Monday (12/17/18), the Special Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro Court of Appeals ruled on an administrative proceeding initiated at the request of the Rio de Janeiro Bar Association, and decided, by a unanimous decision, to cancel Precedent # 75, which provided that " The mere breach of a legal or contractual obligation, for characterizing mere annoyance, does not in principle constitute moral damages, unless said breach results in a circumstance that violates the dignity of the party.

Read the full alert »

                   

Related News

Loading...